Forced Arbitration Clauses Routinely Inserted Into the Fine Print of Contracts

Written by Adam Peck Category: Arbitration Agreements April 24th, 2015 3 min read

Forced arbitration clauses routinely are inserted into the fine print of contracts:

Consumers are forced to sign arbitration agreements to buy a product or service or get a job. Carnival Cruises uses forced arbitration – a fact that may hinder the passengers on the nightmare cruise of the Triumph. Clippy Shareable Microsoft, the company that gave us Vista, Ctrl-Alt-Delete and Clippy, is phasing in forced arbitration. The photo sharing service Instagram uses it – and some fear Instagram’s parent company, Facebook, may be next.
Under forced arbitration an individual consumers or employees must fight it out alone before a private arbitrator chosen by the company that cheated or discriminated against them. Arbitrators do not need to be lawyers or follow precedent, yet their word is nearly always final and unappealable.
Facing off against a corporation in arbitration is like playing a baseball game in which the other team hires, fires – and pays – the umpires. So it’s no wonder a study of top arbitrators for one major arbitration firm found that they rule for big business 93.8 percent of the time.
One major arbitration company, the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) persuaded corporations to add forced arbitration clauses to their contracts – clauses specifying that NAF would do the arbitrating. In other words, they marketed their services to the same companies they would be judging.
In addition, forced arbitration clauses often ban class-action suits, which allow individuals to band together to bring their common claims against big corporations.
As was said in the alliance for Justice 2013 report, Arbitration Activism, the arbitration system gives corporations “a free pass to break the law.” In keeping with its ongoing deference to corporate special interests, the majority on the U.S. Supreme Court has effectively rewritten federal law, issuing decision after decision helping big business make the most of that free pass.
Arbitration is spreading to employment contracts, and nursing home and long term care agreements, threatening to make it nearly impossible for workers to sue over race, sex or age discrimination, elder abuse, medical malpractice, wrongful death and to contracts between small businesses and their corporate suppliers.
When it comes to how workers fare in employment disputes, one study found that “[o]utcomes in arbitration are starkly inferior to outcomes in litigation.” Even a lawyer who specializes in representing employers says “there’s no question that [arbitration] favors the company’s interest over employees.”

NEVER EVER SIGN AN ARBITRATION AGREEMENT!!

Share it

Questions? Check with Peck Today

Blog Lead Form

Elder Abuse and Neglect in Assisted Living Facilities

Elopement in Nursing Homes

Assisted Living Abuse

Settlement Reached in Assisted Living Facility Death

Assisted Living Abuse and Neglect Attorneys

Written by Adam Peck

Expertise: Personal Injury

Adam J. Peck, ESQ is a principal with Peck Law Group, APC. In 2008, Mr. Adam Peck received his Juris Doctorate from Whittier Law School where he graduated Cum Laude. His practice is primarily dedicated to representing Elders, Dependent Adults, along with their loved ones and family members, who have suffered horrific personal injuries.