Why is the Plaintiff entitled to Sanctions for Destruction of Evidence in a Wrongful Death Case?

Written by Adam Peck Category: Wrongful Death May 16th, 2013 2 min read

Why is the Plaintiff entitled to Sanctions for Destruction of Evidence in a Wrongful Death Case? As a sanction for destruction of evidence by the National Park Service in a wrongful death case, a federal judge in Sacramento, Calif., ruled On May 14, 2013 that the United States was negligent.

The case concerns the July 2009 death of Tommy Botell, 9, after a retaining wall that he and his sister had been sitting on collapsed. Damages are also being sought for his sister, who was injured in the accident at Lassen Volcanic National Park. Litigants can be sanctioned for destroying evidence. This is sometimes called Spoliation of Evidence.

Adopting the findings and recommendation of a magistrate, U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley held that the government was negligent “for all purposes in this case.”

The magistrate found that the government “purposely destroyed” the remains of the retaining wall, and that the park director and some staff knew the wall was unsafe, the newspaper says.

“What is less clear, although highly suspicious, is whether defendant [destroyed] evidence other than the wall,” U.S. Magistrate Gregory G. Hollows wrote in a previous decision.

Still undecided in the case and expected to be addressed at a June hearing is whether the government can assert a “discretionary function” defense under the Federal Tort Claims Act, according to Peck. The government argues that those in charge of the park had discretion to decide whether or not to repair the wall, and hence the government cannot be held liable for their decision-making.

The U.S. attorney’s Office in Sacramento declined comment about the ruling when contacted by the newspaper.

Share it

Questions? Check with Peck Today

Blog Lead Form

Elder Abuse and Neglect in Assisted Living Facilities

Elopement in Nursing Homes

Assisted Living Abuse

Settlement Reached in Assisted Living Facility Death

Assisted Living Abuse and Neglect Attorneys

Written by Adam Peck

Expertise: Personal Injury

Adam J. Peck, ESQ is a principal with Peck Law Group, APC. In 2008, Mr. Adam Peck received his Juris Doctorate from Whittier Law School where he graduated Cum Laude. His practice is primarily dedicated to representing Elders, Dependent Adults, along with their loved ones and family members, who have suffered horrific personal injuries.