Skip to main content

phoneFREE CASE EVALUATION (866) 999-9085

 About Adam Peck

Adam J. Peck, ESQ is a principal with Peck Law Group, APC. In 2008, Mr. Adam Peck received his Juris Doctorate from Whittier Law School where he graduated Cum Laude. His practice is primarily dedicated to representing Elders, Dependent Adults, along with their loved ones and family members, who have suffered horrific personal injuries.

Peck Law Group Files Official Complaint for Elderly Victim of Severe Bed Sore Neglect in Los Angeles County, California

Files with documents on bed sores in Los Angeles California

In January 2022, the Peck Law Group and Foundation Aiding the Elderly (FATE) filed an official complaint on behalf of a decedent that was in an assisted living facility in Los Angeles. This former patient suffered extreme nursing neglect, including severe bed sores, dehydration, sepsis, and malnutrition, during his less than two-year residency at the assisted living facility, Windsor Care Center of Cheviot Hills.

In the State of California, if an elderly loved one passes from pain and suffering due to negligence in a nursing home, surviving family members can file a wrongful death lawsuit against the at-fault nursing facility.

In this case, the elderly resident had a full knee replacement surgery and was placed in Windsor Care Center for rehabilitation. When the elderly resident entered Windsor Care Center in December of 2018, he had clear skin and was beginning the recovery process.

However, throughout 2019, the elderly resident would suffer from severe dehydration, colon inflammation, and uncontrollable blood pressure. He would be sent to nearby hospitals in Southern California for treatment, then return to the Windsor facility.

During the ensuing months, the elderly resident relayed to his daughter that he used his call button for nursing staff to come and clean him. He also shared that a nursing assistant turned off his call button, stating they would return shortly. The elderly resident waited between two and three hours for nursing staff to return and clean him, and he developed bed sores during that time. 

In March of 2020, the elderly resident’s daughter was unable to visit him at the assisted living facility due to COVID-19. Her father developed a serious condition that was left untreated for three days. The facility failed to notify the resident’s family, as well as the nursing staff and attending physician, about a significant change in his condition.

During this time, the Windsor care staff failed to notify the decedent’s family and physician about other changes in his condition.

In mid-May of 2020, the elderly resident’s daughter called Windsor and spoke to the charge nurse, who assured her that her father was fine and tested negative for COVID. However, the nursing facility failed to mention that her father had pneumonia.

A few days later, the elderly resident’s daughter received a call that her father was unresponsive. He would be taken to a nearby hospital, transferred to the ICU, and later, the CCU. In late May, her father tested positive for COVID and soon passed away.

Note that an initial complaint about this case resulted in Windsor receiving Federal Tag deficiencies for failures to revise the patient’s care plan, notify the physician of certain conditions, ensure medications were administered, and ensure the patient was free of significant medication errors.

The issued Federal Tag deficiencies made headway for this case, but justice for the decedent and his family continues to be imperative.

Due to the assisted living facility’s reckless negligence, lack of quality care, and insufficient staffing, the Peck Law Group, APC, will continue to advocate for the decedent and his family.

California Revised Its Survival Action Statute

Wronful death lady liberty statue in California

As of January 1, 2022, significant amendments were made to the long-standing California law, Code of Civil Procedure [“C.C.P.”]§ 377.34, which may greatly affect your wrongful death case. These major amendments aim to resolve survival action cases in the State of California, marking California the 46th state to allow this type of recovery for a deceased person, otherwise known as a decedent.

Here, we will compare the old CCP 377.34 versus the revised version and what these amendments could mean for decedents and their families.

Not only is this news significant for the State of California, but it may impact how the Peck Law Group attorneys handle wrongful death claims in the future.

Wrongful Death Claim Versus Survival Action

A wrongful death claim emphasizes the decedent’s close family members, allowing them to file a wrongful death action against those responsible for the decedent’s death and damages.

Potential damages in a wrongful death claim include:

  • Grief
  • Suffering
  • Financial losses
  • Funeral expenses
  • Medical bills.

A survival action alleges a decedent’s sustained damages between injury and actual death.

In most states, a survival action occurs in tandem with a wrongful death claim. Additionally, the decedent’s estate often recovers damages for a decedent’s pain, suffering, or disfigurement in a survival action.

Before the current amendments to CCP 377.34, survival action claims could not be made in conjunction with wrongful death claims in the State of California.

Comparing the Old CCP 377.34 & Revised CCP 377.34

Initially, the long-standing CCP 377.34 prevented any recovery of damages for a decedent’s pain, suffering, or disfigurement in a survival action, including financial.

Now, the revised CCP 377.34 states that recovery of said damages is permitted through January 1, 2026, in the State of California.

When Does the Revised CCP 377.34 Take Effect?

On October 1, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom approved amendments for the survival action statute under Senate Bill Number 447.

On January 1, 2022, the amended CCP 377.34 went into effect, increasing the price to resolve survival actions in California.

Under the revised CCP 377.34, all civil cases filed on or after January 1, 2022, and before January 1, 2026, will be allowed to recover damages for a decedent’s pain, suffering, or disfigurement in a survival action.

The current end date of January 1, 2026 means the revised law is not yet permanent in the State of California.

Wrongful Death in Los Angeles & Orange County

The Peck Law Group attorneys have vast expertise in wrongful death claims, law, and litigation. When loved ones recover from traumatic losses, such as the wrongful death of a family member, it can be emotional.

The Peck Law Group will continue to advocate for families seeking protection due to the wrongful death of a loved one. Our attorneys are happy to provide support and resources for you to ensure you receive the best possible outcome.

For more information about how the Peck Law Group attorneys help grieving families navigate recovery following the wrongful death of a loved one, please visit Practice Areas: Wrongful Death or call 866-999-9085 to speak with an attorney for free today.

Peck Law Group Secures $2.5 Million Dollar Verdict for Elderly Victim of Extreme Abuse and Neglect in Riverside County, California

The Peck Law Group recently achieved an extremely successful jury verdict of $2.5 million dollars for a Riverside County resident living in an assisted living facility in Moreno Valley, California. This resident suffered serious and painful injuries due to the extreme abuse and neglect, and total lack of care, during plaintiff’s residency in the assisted living facility, Integrated Care Communities.

In California, state regulations require assisted living homes to reappraise residents who have dementia at least once every 12 months—or when the resident’s condition changes significantly.

The plaintiff in this case was a woman with dementia. When she began living at Integrated Care Communities, she was fairly healthy and able to care for herself independently. After living in the facility for about a year, plaintiff’s condition rapidly declined. She required substantial assistance with her activities of daily living according to the records kept by the facility.

Despite state regulations, specifically requiring the facility to reassess the plaintiff’s condition after a year of residency, it negligently failed to do so. The facility also failed to adhere to state regulations requiring a reassessment due to any significant change in the plaintiff’s physical conditions.

According to state regulations, the facility should have conducted a complete independent reassessment when the plaintiff was suddenly unable to walk due to pain, and required wheelchair assistance.

At trial, the Peck Law Group attorneys called the plaintiff’s treating physician to testify. The attorneys skillfully elicited testimony from the plaintiff’s doctor, establishing that she had not been notified of substantial changes in the plaintiff’s condition—such as decreased appetite, mobility decline, increased lethargy and pain.

The plaintiff’s doctor testified that she should have been informed of these types of changes without any significant delay. The physician further testified, that if she had known about these changes, she would have changed the plaintiff’s treatment plan immediately, recommending that the plaintiff be summarily moved to a skilled nursing home for her to receive the higher level of medical care that the plaintiff should have been receiving.

The evidence at trial demonstrated that, eventually, the care staff at Integrated Care Communities discovered a large knot on the plaintiff’s tailbone area along with a very foul smell. Rather than giving the plaintiff immediate medical attention, the caregivers gave the plaintiff a shower, while still not advising plaintiff’s physician of the plaintiff’s change of condition.

Because of the assisted living facility’s reckless neglect, Plaintiff had to be hospitalized.

She was diagnosed there with various injuries and illnesses, including a stage four pressure injury to her coccyx and sepsis with acute organ dysfunction. A stage four pressure injury is the most severe level. At this stage, the injury has entered the muscle and had settled into her exposed bone, causing her a very severe painful infection.

The plaintiff was also required to unnecessarily undergo a painful procedure to remove the dead skin attributed to the Stage IV Coccyx down to the bone pressure injury.

At trial, expert medical witness testimony found that the facility’s staff was recklessly neglectful and negligent due to their failure to properly assess the plaintiff’s condition, her significant medical changes, and to immediately report these changes to her doctor. This witness also testified that these injuries would have easily been prevented if the plaintiff’s treating physician had been properly notified.

Ultimately, after a 14-day trial, the plaintiff and her legal team, the Peck Law Group, APC, prevailed. The Jury awarded $2.5 million dollars as just compensation for her pain and suffering, incurred as a result of the assisted living facility’s reckless neglect and negligence.