Skip to main content

phoneFREE CASE EVALUATION (866) 999-9085

 About Adam Peck

Adam J. Peck, ESQ is a principal with Peck Law Group, APC. In 2008, Mr. Adam Peck received his Juris Doctorate from Whittier Law School where he graduated Cum Laude. His practice is primarily dedicated to representing Elders, Dependent Adults, along with their loved ones and family members, who have suffered horrific personal injuries.

Trump Administration Attempt to Rollback Nursing Home Abuse, Fraud & Neglect Preventions is Appalling

A letter sent to the Trump administration Wednesday by 17 attorney generals from across the nation, including California’s, is urging federal agencies to reconsider the “regulatory rollback” of reforms under the Obama administration meant to prevent nursing home patient abuse, fraud and neglect.

The letter was sent in anticipation of the June rule-making process where several the 2016 nursing home oversight reforms will be revisited to deem whether they are too burdensome, according to a news release from California Attorney General Xavier Becerra.

“It is our duty to be vigilant of the health and safety of our aging loved ones. America’s seniors who reside in skilled nursing facilities deserve quality care from trained and capable staff,” Becerra said during a news conference in Los Angeles on Wednesday. “California has made great strides in holding accountable those who take advantage of vulnerable communities. The Trump administration is now attempting to strip our seniors of crucial protections that shield them from nursing home abuse, neglect and exploitation. This is reckless. The California Department of Justice stands ready to take any action necessary to protect our loved ones.”

The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services began implementing long-term nursing home care reforms in 2016 meant to prevent the spread of infections, improve staff training, provide protections against abuse against Medicaid and Medicare patients, and ban arbitration agreements.

The reforms are set to rollout over three phases, but the second set of phases and certain penalties against nursing homes were delayed in November by 18 months to allow more time to inform the nursing homes of the changes.

The centers also lowered the amount and frequency of fines against nursing homes for past violations.

“If allowed to proceed, recent regulatory changes will not only threaten the mental and physical security of some of the most vulnerable residents of our states, but also potentially create additional challenges for [State Medicaid Fraud Control Units] investigation and prosecution of grievances, violations, and crimes occurring in [skilled nursing facilities],” the letter states. “We therefore urge you not to lower the level of regulatory oversight.”

A state audit released earlier this month found California agencies oversight of nursing homes was lacking during a 10-year period when patient care violations were increasing.

The Peck Law Group, APC represents Elders, Seniors, and Dependent Adults that are the subject of Physical Abuse and Neglect in Skilled Nursing, Assisted Living, and Long Term Care Facilities.  Please contact us if you or your loved one has been injured.  We will help you!!!

Nursing Home Resident Dropped Six Times Before her 7th Fatal Fall Causing Her Wrongful Death

A Virginia family is suing their mother’s former nursing home over her death following a fall. The woman, Fannye Doris Holden Scruggs Rorer, was an amputee who had only one eye and suffered from Alzheimer’s. On April 15, 2016, she had been a resident of Woodhaven Hall at Williamsburg Landing in Williamsburg, VA for 5 years when a lone CNA attempted to transfer her from her bed using a hoyer lift. During the transfer, Ms. Rorer fell and X-rays later showed she suffered compression fractures on her lumbar spine. Instead of moving Ms. Rorer to a hospital for treatment, the facility chose to keep her on site. Ms. Rorer died 8 days late at age 87.

 

Victim Suffered Repeated Falls Before Death
The lawsuit also alleges that Ms. Rorer had been dropped 6 times in the months leading up to her fatal fall in April 2016. The Virginia Department of Health had also cited the facility in 2015 and again in 2016 during an inspection conducted less than 2 months prior to Ms. Rorer’s fall. The citations from that inspection include nursing staff’s failure to notify a resident’s doctor that she was in severe pain following a fall, as well as a lack of care plan for a patient following a bowel surgery.

A hoyer lift is a hydraulic system that involves placing a sling under the patient’s body to move them from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair). The device is typically used for patients who are mostly unable to move around independently and while it is unclear what the care plan detailed for Ms. Rorer, most healthcare professionals believe that the lift requires two people to operate. Patients may be too heavy for one CNA to transfer safely, a patient could slip out of the device, struggle to break free, or the device could flip over or otherwise malfunction.

The complaint against Woodhaven Hall at Williamsburg Landing alleges that Ms. Rorer should have been transferred by two CNAs vs. just one, especially after suffering from 6 other falls during lifts transfers in mere months.


Falls During Lift Transfers: An Entirely Preventable Death
Woodhaven Hall at Williamsburg Landing is an extremely small facility with only 15 beds. It does not accept Medicaid and the family is said to have spent $600,000 for her care in the 5 years in which she was a resident. Ms. Rorer was a lifelong resident of Williamsburg and the nursing home, right in her hometown, is said to be one of the best. The family is suing for over $2 million.

Ms. Rorer’s tragic death is a reminder that even the best, most expensive nursing homes can still be negligent. One fall during a lift transfer is unacceptable, but to have allowed a resident to fall a total of 7 times and ultimately die is reprehensible. The facility’s policy, if it doesn’t already, should clearly state that at least 2 staff members are required to transfer a patient. While only time will tell if the cause of the fall was inadequate staffing or a CNAs failure to follow policy, it is hard to imagine a legitimate reason why the nursing home allowed Ms. Rorer to fall once, much less 7 times.

Should you or your loved one experience Physical Abuse and / or Neglect in a Nursing Home, Assisted Living Facility, or a Long Term Acute Care Facility please call the Peck Law Group, APC toll free at 1-866-999-9085.  We will help you!!!

A Party Engaged in Arbitration Who is Unable to Afford to Continue In such Forum may Now Seek Financial Relief in the State of California

When a party who has engaged in arbitration in good faith, is unable to afford to continue in such a forum, that party may seek relief from the Superior Court in the State of California.

If sufficient evidence is presented on these issues, and the court concludes the party’s financial status is not a result of the party’s intentional attempt to avoid arbitration, the court may issue an order specifying: (1) the arbitration shall continue so long as the other party to the arbitration agrees to pay, or the arbitrator orders it to pay, all fees and costs of the arbitration; and (2) if neither of those occur, the arbitration shall be deemed “had” and the case may proceed in the Superior Court.

At oral argument in this case, the defendants claimed that allowing parties to seek relief from arbitration in the courts based on their current financial condition creates an open invitation for abuse by those seeking to escape their arbitration obligations. the California appellate court opined “We seriously doubt parties will purposefully make themselves impecunious to have their cases returned to the courts. Regardless, we are more concerned with deep-pocketed parties leveraging their wealth to deprive their opponents of the right to resolve their disputes, than we are with parties choosing to bankrupt themselves as a way out of arbitration and into court. And, under our holding  a court may not grant relief if the evidence demonstrates a party’s financial status is a result of the party’s intentional attempt to avoid arbitration. “

As our Supreme Court has explained, “[b]oth California and federal law treat the substitution of arbitration for litigation as the mere replacement of one dispute resolution forum for another, resulting in no inherent disadvantage.” (Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno (2013) 57 Cal.4th 1109, 1152.) With the rising costs of arbitration (see Toyo Tire Holdings Of Americas Inc. v. Continental Tire North America, Inc. (9th Cir. 2010) 609 F.3d 975, 980-981), the California Appellate decision in Rae Weiler v. Marcus Millichap Real Estate Investments, Inc. California Fourth District Court of Appeal Division Three, ensures those compelled to arbitrate will not, as a result of finances, be inherently disadvantaged.

A very sound reasoned decision by the California Appellate Courts.